Know the risk before you build the workflow
A two-stage, founder-led assessment of one workflow: first its risk and readiness, then the architecture to build it under MAS TRM and PDPA controls.
Workflow risk & readiness
Should this workflow be automated, and under what controls?
Architecture & blueprint
How is it built and governed on sovereign infrastructure?
- Workflow risk profileASSESSED
- Data boundarySPECIFIED
- Control pointsGATED
- Delivery roadmapSEQUENCED
Illustrative — sample artifact
Workflow risk profile
Where automation adds exposure, and where it doesn't
Data-boundary design
What data enters the workflow, where it stays, who can see it
Control & escalation points
Where a person approves, overrides, or escalates
Sequenced roadmap
Build order set against real dependencies
What each stage delivers
Decide first. Design second.
Each stage is fixed in scope, paid up front, and led by the founding team. Stage 2 starts only when you choose to proceed. Stage 1 can stand alone.
Workflow risk & readiness
Workflow risk profile
A structured read of the risks specific to this one workflow: who acts, on what data, with what consequence
Data-exposure map
Where sensitive data enters, moves through, and leaves the workflow
Control gaps
Gaps against MAS TRM and PDPA expectations for the workflow as described
Go / no-go recommendation
A clear recommendation on whether to proceed, and the conditions attached
Architecture & blueprint
Domain context model
The sources, roles, and decision points the workflow depends on, mapped end to end
Data & ingest boundary specification
What is ingested, from where, and the boundaries it must not cross
Control & escalation points
Where a person approves, overrides, or escalates, and what is recorded each time
Sequenced delivery roadmap
Build order set against real dependencies, signed off before build
What we review
- The workflow as it runs today, with the people who run it
- Data sources and systems the workflow touches
- Existing policies, controls, and approval paths
- Applicable MAS TRM, MAS 658/1121 and PDPA obligations
Who this is for
MAS-regulated institutions and Singapore public-sector entities with a named workflow in mind, but not yet built.
- Chief Operating Officer
- Head of Transformation
- Head of Compliance
Scope boundaries
What this is not
An inventory of AI you already run
A platform deployment
An agent-orchestration or continual-learning build
A certification: no scores are published
After Stage 2
A blueprint that works with any next step
Governed deployment on your infrastructure
The blueprint becomes the scope for deploying Aether™ Console and Core in your environment
Ongoing oversight
Where the workflow needs continuing governance, the same blueprint anchors a managed subscription
Your own delivery team
The blueprint is a self-contained document your team or another vendor can build from
Design-partner engagement
We're selecting a small number of design partners. Early engagements carry preferential terms in exchange for a reference.
Take the next step
Start with the workflow, not the platform
Start here when the workflow is known but not yet built. Already running AI in production? Start with the AI Risk Discovery Pilot.